Scrutineer · By framework
North Carolina GovRAMP compliance for NCDIT vendors
North Carolina now buys cloud services on GovRAMP status. New executive branch contracts have carried GovRAMP requirements since April 1, 2026, and from April 1, 2027 there is no on-ramp at all.
Scrutineer holds your NIST 800-53 controls and evidence once, shows which GovRAMP status your data class demands, and tracks each contract's window on one timeline.
Control-mapped findings · linked evidence · you decide what to remediate
Interactive walkthrough on a sample company, not a scan of your systems.
›
Worked example with sample findings, not a scrutiny of your environment. Not an audit attestation.
Controls in evidence-linked report out
AI scrutinizes you decide
Why it works
What you get with NC GovRAMP
Your data classification picks the status, and the deadline
North Carolina does not set one GovRAMP level for everyone. The NCDIT policy supplement, Third-Party Cloud Service Risk Authorization and Management, version 1.0 of February 2026, ties the required status to the highest class of state data your product will hold. Public data needs only a GovRAMP Security Snapshot Score, validated before award and reviewed every year. Internal data needs GovRAMP Core, either at award or within 12 months. Confidential data, such as personnel or student records, needs GovRAMP Ready within 15 months. Restricted data, such as federal tax information, payment card data, PHI or criminal justice information, needs GovRAMP Authorized within 21 months. Those windows are shorter than the ones Arizona publishes, so do not copy another state's plan.
FedRAMP Rev. 5 counts. FedRAMP 20x does not
A FedRAMP Rev. 5 authorization held at the time of award is accepted in place of GovRAMP. The same sentence of the policy then says that authorizations obtained through the FedRAMP 20x pilot program will not be permitted. That matters to the growing number of SaaS companies who chose 20x as the faster federal route. A 20x authorization that works for a federal agency does not satisfy a North Carolina contract, and the state may separately ask a FedRAMP holder to enroll in GovRAMP Fast Track so it can read continuous monitoring through the GovRAMP portal. Check which FedRAMP path you are on before you assume the federal work carries over.
April 1, 2027 is the date with no on-ramp
Since April 1, 2026, new North Carolina contracts with a cloud component carry GovRAMP-aligned requirements, with an on-ramp period set contract by contract. From April 1, 2027, NCDIT says full compliance is mandatory without exception and without an on-ramp. Existing contracts pick up GovRAMP language when they are renewed, extended or amended, and NCDIT's June 2026 guidance only lets a short bridge extension, typically under a year, lean on an existing certification. If the interim window runs out, an agency may grant one extension of no more than six months, and only after its security liaison reviews your latest Progressing Snapshot.
What it handles
Controls in, an evidence-linked report out
Point Scrutineer at a framework or a vendor and it maps every control, pulls the evidence it can find, flags the gaps and scores the risk, returning a report with linked evidence and a prioritized remediation list. Scrutineer is decision support for readiness, an accredited auditor still issues the attestation.
- Holds one NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 control library and maps it to GovRAMP Core, Ready and Authorized, so the North Carolina requirement is a gap list rather than a new program
- Records the data classification each contract allows, Public, Internal, Confidential or Restricted, and shows the GovRAMP status and interim window that class triggers
- Tracks the 12, 15 and 21 month windows from each contract effective date, plus the single six month extension an agency may grant
- Keeps a live POA&M, inventory workbook and vulnerability scan record, the documents GovRAMP standard continuous monitoring access collects every month or quarter
- Keeps the System Security Plan current for agencies that request elevated monitoring access to your SSP, SAP and SAR
- Shows which SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST and TX-RAMP evidence already answers GovRAMP controls, and which controls have nothing behind them yet
- Flags the cloud services your own professional services run on, since North Carolina checks those too when they hold sensitive state data
- Reuses the same evidence for Arizona, Texas, FedRAMP and SOC 2, because every one of those programs tests NIST 800-53 controls you already hold
evidence · MFA enforced and access reviews evidenced.
evidence · Mostly covered; one approval log left untested.
evidence · Two subprocessors missing a current review.
evidence · Data encrypted in transit and at rest, evidenced.
Why Scrutineer
One platform that maps controls and scores risk
Not a static questionnaire, not a pass-fail black box, and not a spreadsheet you maintain by hand. Live control mapping across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI, automatic evidence and a prioritized gap list, returned as a report you can act on. The AI scrutinizes, you decide.
Mapped to real controls
Every framework is broken down into the controls it actually requires, each scored on a red to amber to green scale, so readiness stays transparent and consistent.
Evidence behind every finding
Each control links to the exact evidence that satisfies it, the policy, the config, the log line, so the finding is auditable and your readiness is defensible.
A prioritized gap list
Open gaps roll up into a ranked remediation list, so the highest-risk findings sit at the top and your team fixes what matters before the audit begins.
North Carolina policy reference
What North Carolina requires for each class of state data
Most GovRAMP guides describe the status ladder in general. North Carolina wrote its own rule on top of it: the data class decides the status and the clock, FedRAMP Rev. 5 is accepted, and FedRAMP 20x is not. This table runs on the NCDIT policy supplement itself.
| What the service holds or has | What North Carolina requires | By when | What you file meanwhile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public data only (formerly low risk) | A GovRAMP Security Snapshot Score | Before contract award | An updated score every year, reviewed by the agency |
| Internal data (formerly part of medium risk) | GovRAMP Core | At award, or within 12 months | Progressing Snapshot enrollment before any non-public data moves |
| Confidential data (formerly part of medium risk) | GovRAMP Ready | At award, or within 15 months | Progressing Snapshots validated by the agency every quarter |
| Restricted data (formerly high risk) | GovRAMP Authorized | At award, or within 21 months | Progressing Snapshots validated every quarter |
| A FedRAMP Rev. 5 authorization | Accepted in place of GovRAMP | Must be held at award | Annual check that it is in good standing, and Fast Track if the agency asks |
| A FedRAMP 20x authorization | Not permitted | Not applicable | A GovRAMP status sized to the data class above |
| A SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HITRUST report alone | Not named as a substitute | The status for your data class still applies | Map the evidence to NIST 800-53 and file the GovRAMP package |
| A short bridge extension, under about a year | Existing certification may be relied on | Only during a vendor transition or active solicitation | GovRAMP language at the next renewal or amendment |
Reflects the NCDIT Third-Party Cloud Service Risk Authorization and Management supplement, version 1.0, February 2026, the NCDIT GovRAMP adoption page and its June 2026 guidance on existing contracts, as read in October 2026. Each solicitation sets the exact terms, so confirm yours with the purchasing agency or ESRMO. Scrutineer prepares readiness evidence and does not award any status.
Good questions
Questions about NC GovRAMP
Keep reading
Guides that go deeper on this framework
GovRAMP certification cost and TX-RAMP pricing
The published GovRAMP fee schedule, what the 3PAO adds on top, and why Core is cheaper than it looks.
Read the guideFedRAMP 20x vs Rev 5 requirements
Why the federal route you pick decides whether North Carolina will accept it.
Read the guideGovRAMP vs StateRAMP, and vs FedRAMP
What the 2025 rename changed, the full status ladder, and how reciprocity works.
Read the guideExplore more
More ways to scrutinize compliance and risk with Scrutineer
SOC 2 compliance
Map controls to the Trust Services Criteria, collect evidence, and close gaps before audit.
Learn moreSOC 2 compliance software
A platform that maps SOC 2 controls, automates evidence, and tracks readiness continuously.
Learn moreISO 27001 compliance
Map your ISMS to Annex A, automate evidence, and stay certification-ready.
Learn moreStop guessing about readiness. Scrutinize on real evidence.
Point Scrutineer at a framework or a vendor and it maps every control, gathers evidence and scores the risk, returning an evidence-linked report and a prioritized gap list. The AI scrutinizes, you decide.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR & PCI · evidence-linked controls · readiness, not certification